UFOs OF US-Tech
Director André Carson, in the recent UFO conference asked the Under Secretary of Defense, Ronald S. Moultrie “whether there are efforts in place to ensure that the U.S. government is not ‘chasing its own tail,’ by potentially collecting information on its own secret aircraft.” Moultrie assured Congress that the “DOD has established relationships to help ‘deconflict activities we have’ to prevent AOIMSG collection of data on experimental platforms produced by the U.S. Government.” Technically Carson didn’t ask if UFOs are our aircraft. I wonder why?
Could one assume that Carson was indeed asking if UFOs are ours? He didn’t ask that directly, but I would assume he wants to know if they are ours. Because if they are, we’re wasting time and money with this UFO question and office, right? Doesn’t Carson have a fiscal duty to the public to ask that, and not in a close session?
Cause I would like to have known the answer to that direct question. And if they said no, I would then ask, “Why did the Navy Patent UFO, antigravity technology?” That’s on record. That’s a fact! And so, why is it there is a correlation with the fact people see saucers and the US Patent office has a saucer blue print from the Navy? Were they going to pass UFOs and orbs off as theirs?
And, if the Navy has that stuff, why are you abducting our own citizens and doing experiments on them?
Do you have a base under the ocean? In space? Are you the secret ‘space force’ everyone talks about? Or are these the German saucers we were fighting in World War II, and the same ones that kicked your Navy butts in Antarctica? Oh, did you think I didn’t know about that UFO lore? Did Byrd get is butt beat by aliens, Germans, or both?
Why was that defeat so hush hush?
Engineering Reality
Per one of the articles you can find on Navy Patents and top secret technology, you read this:
This not only allows things to defy gravity, but it could move through the air without an air signature, no sonic booms. It could go into water and back without altering it’s speed. It could go into space. If you were looking at it, you would be able to discern an aura- something many of the UFOs have, suggesting a warp bubble or such.
I wonder if Deputy Director of Naval Intelligence, Scott W. Bray, knows about this? I wonder if anyone at that hearing really knows anything. I wonder who we have to interview to start dsicovering some really good information.
UFOs and cloaks
They discussed signature management at the hearing, a way of cloaking or interfering with radar. Isn’t it funny, then, that the language Moultrie and Bray use seem to be evidence of their own signature management?
All objects in space/time have signatures. A ship in the ocean has a signature that is specially specific to it. Even if you had the same class ship with the same engine, there are subtleties that give the engine and ship it’s own fingerprint, even though it came from the same assembly line.
These objects also transmit RF signals. It’s suggests they’re communicating, not just masking. If they’re unmanned, you’d almost expect that to be so.
I found it interesting that no one has yet tried speaking to them. Why couldn’t a military pilot go to an open channel and speak directly, “You are flying in US designated airspace. Please identify yourself.”
That’s fair. If they have RF signals, why not match their RF frequencies and see what happens? Could we jam their frequencies? Why aren’t we trying that?
“The biggest thing that you’re looking for there is any indication of an effort to jam whatever sensors that we may have looking at it,” Bray says… “That’s a part of what we’ll be looking at in the AIMSOG,” Moultrie says, noting the hope to us RF frequency detections in an effort to try to determine the nature and function of some UAP.
Are UFOs masking, communicating with others, with us, or something we don’t even know? Could the RF just be the way they move through the air?
Why are we just observing? Oh, could it be because we know they out fly us, out tech us, and out smart us, so we’re waiting on them to make the first move?
So, back to the question why aren’t we reaching out to them? Has not one person gave a benevolent greeting so that maybe we could start a discourse? Instead of just observing or posturing, maybe just say “Hello, Orb. Nice to meet you.”
What’s the worst that might happen? A broken window?
There’s another question for the DOD and DNI. President Ronald Reagan said Steven Spielberg got Close Encounters dead-on-right! He told Spielberg at the screening of the above movie: “there are only a number of people in this room who know that everything on that screen is absolutely true.” How mind blowing is that? Does the DOD and DNI know that? Did Reagan know more than them? Does Spielberg? There is evidence that NASA sent a 20 page letter to Spielberg telling him not to make Close Encounters of the Third Kind?
Why?
Which brings me back to the the discussion at the UFO hearing where they discussed shutting down disinformation. So if there were laws that kept people from talking about UFOs, would there be no Close Encounters or ET?
I suspect, even if they make laws against discussing this- I will keep talking and writing and asking question and making comparisons. It’s what I do. I doubt I would ever be bothered or worrisome to folks. People will most likely just not find a place to publish.
Even Redits UFO group might go away.
I wonder what people on Medium would read or write about if that were ever to happen. When did a good ghost story over a campfire become disinformation?
