UFO/UAPs
Richard Dolan, UFO researcher, asked a fundamental question in his podcast, the Richard Dolan show, found linked below. Seems like a good math question. There are probably some researchers interested in doing statistics. Nolan gave a surprising statistic for comparison. In 2021 there were 22 million commercial flights. 22 million flights world wide was the result of operating roughly 28,000 aircraft- utilizing many of those multiple times a day. So, can we draw a comparison and guestimate the number of UFOs operating in our sky? Wouldn’t that depend on the assumption they’re Earth based?
If anyone has a source for anyone else asking this question, Nolan is interested in knowing. If no one has asked the question, could it be because we just don’t know enough about UFOs?
Can we assume different shapes corelates to different manufacturers or species? If antigravity is real, are ships limited to specific shapes? Do cubes with warp bubbles suggest you just need a warp bubble?
Assuming UFOs come from other planets, or dimensions, can we answer Nolan’s question? How many ships are one time visitors? How many are doing routine surveillance? If they’re from one planet, maybe we can get closer to an answer, as they might have a fleet, equivalent to a military branch or commercial aviation agency which routinely sends flights.
There seems to be consensus in the UFO world, there are at least three species of aliens competing for resources on Earth. If that’s accurate, someone must be doing some math on the number of ships.
If you can print spacecraft as easily as we can print toys with our printers, how do we get at a number of ships? We’re now having to ask, can anyone in advance civilization print spacecraft and go, or is it regulated by industry, resources, and or social agencies?
NUFORC and MUFON
There are agencies collecting UFO data. With any endeavor, the quality of data will vary. Humans are involved. Variance is true of government, academics, corporations, and civilian endeavors. There is good UFO data. The analysis of the data has not reached the halls of academia, but there is no shortage of qualified people making analysis from the data collected.
How long have NUFORC and MUFON been around? They’ve been saying UFOs are real for a moment. Many qualified people have been saying as much.
There appears to have been agencies involved who have not been faithfully reporting to the public. It seems clear that Project Blue Book was an attempt by the Air Force to squash interest in UFOs. Emphasis was placed on the explainable. The unexplained was dismissed.
It is likely that if we include all data sets on UFOs from at least the 1940s to present, even sorting out questionable data, we can conclude UFOs are real, and there is a non-human intelligence engaging humanity. Maybe that’s an unreasonable statement for the pure academic, but then- in an a world where the government says UFOs are real- isn’t the obligation to falsify that now in the hands of the academic?
How does the academic do that? First, they need to start with a literature search. They need to read every UFO book and verify sources where they can. Then, they look at the data collected by MUFON and NUFORC. They would interview witnesses. There needs to be recognition of data prior to 2004! Avoiding or excluding all data sets without examination and analysis is not scientific.
If that was done honestly, I suspect even Neil deGrasse Tyson would be saying, “It’s aliens.”
