"Humans will inevitably become more self-conscious if they think someone else is watching." I wish this were true. There is evidence enough to argue, you can have cameras in peoples houses, knowledge the household is being monitored and will be on national television, and still bad behavior doesn't change, as evidence by any episode of Doctor Phil. Maybe not a great example, but consider any reality tv show as evidence? Or, for eons, "god is watching," has not slowed the roll of evil, even by the people saying 'god is watching.'

Genuine good acting is measured by what a person thinks and does when no one is watching. That said, the artifact I highlighted interested me enough that I have an inkling of a new thought that I want to better grasp.

Disclosure threatens authority. I think it reasonable to speculate that most authority is ruled by a concept of 'might makes right.' Acknowledging that UFOs undermines authority because why should human listen to you when this power over here is greater? If UFOs made there presence known, would most humanity shift allegiance to the greater power, even when that power hasn't necessarily offered sanctuary.?

This is may be a poor analogy, but it seems like it is the thing humans keep struggling with that leads to conflict. Sovereignty. Does individual or state have fundamental rights to declare or disavow loyalty. It was stated Ukraine can't join NATO. Not clear enough to eliminate all hope. That hope, and movement towards a western mindset, or whatever that means, seems to be the excuse for war, though likely more complex factors have shaped this. How much interference in the lives of individuals and states exercising sovereignty has led us here? Still that hope defines us, the idea of liberty compels us, all of us, and who doesn't get mad when other individual or group unnecessarily compel us against our own devices? Can a person, can a state, say YES OR NO, to the powers that be. If we first accept there is a God, in a war between God and State, God should win, which given the movement towards secularism, one can argue state won. One can argue the degree of complicity that state had in undermining God. Nietzsche said God is dead, was likely spoken on a death bed of the utility of moral standing, but can we argue the lawlessness of the land is connected?

Does UFO change this landscape? Does it bring us back towards a greater mystery and reverence for things unseen, and the consequences of our thoughts and action requires a greater degree of questions about life, authority, and allegiance? Does nature and the populace deserve more loyalty than poor stewardship. In the absence of reasonable leadership, will our longing manifest something else?

I suspect you and I may agree, this is a spiritual war in process, or something akin to that and we just lack the words because we still think paranormal is a state that arises against normality, but in truth- all that is has to be normal by definition of existence within a universal framework. Where we disagree is in who the bad actors are. Though Luis Elizondo, in a recent video, has made a really good argument that we have no evidence that UFO(aliens) are benevolent, I find if I speak that thing in my heart to any degree of accuracy, I trust aliens, non humans, including dogs, much more than I trust fellow humans.