Member-only story
UAP/Alien
Legalese Trickery to UFOs
Maybe there is no evidence for ‘alien’ technology, but what about ‘non-human technology?’ Is the game that subtle?
Sometimes it’s best to wait to see how the ashes settle before one pokes a dumpster fire. The Pentagon has what, more than quadrupled down on ‘no evidence for aliens,’ something they’ve been doing since the 60s, even though they offer no evidence to support alternative solutions. Even if the BBC is correct in echoing the latest report from the government, that UFOs are explained by military experiments, then where is the no push back on why the military is abducting people from around the world and doing experiments on them? In the report, does it specify there is no evidence for aliens in the specific cases they looked at? What about the ones we know ARRO didn’t look at? What about the ones Congress members are saying it’s interdimensional beings, ‘not aliens?’
Notice the Reuters headline, “Pentagon says MOST” things are explainable. It didn’t say all. Though not technically a contradiction to “No empirical Evidence for aliens” that doesn’t mean there isn’t evidence that can be interpreted as being non-human tech.
If the government has tictac UFOs that can accelerate at 5,000 Gs and not kill the pilot or destroy the…
