UFO/UAP
These Crazy UFO Stories Keep Coming
When I lead with ‘I am not a great writer,’ and ‘I am definitely not a journalist,’ this is neither lament, nor an attempt to gain sympathy. I have many strengths. I am knowledgeable in a broad array of information sets. One of the advantages of writing on Medium, utilizing today's technology, has been an ability to easily hyperlink references. In the past, I could have told you stuff but it would have sounded crazy! It may still sound crazy, but when you have source material- you, the reader, have more than my word to evaluate the subject. If one source happens to be a website that gets turned off, or videos get pulled from a platform- the floor gets ripped out from under these essay!
In the past, if I couldn’t back something up with source, I simply didn’t share.
There is a lament here. I fear the missing hyperlinks threaded through my writing will reveal the weakness in my presentation. Like giving a lecture and the slide don’t advance, or the audio doesn’t play- a professor is only as good as his presentation.
Excercise Mainbrace, above is a story that got ripped away from society, and it needs to be anchored into place. We need a place where better scholars than I can sort through source material and make hypothesis- and this needs to be public domain!
Everyone needs to know where this stuff comes from! When it comes to UFOs, they need source material!
Eye On Cinema, has been radically censored from youtube. Probably not out of maliciousness, but I have been wondering when the channel would be hit with copyright infringement. I don’t understand that concept completely. A person could have a video shut down due to music in the background, barely audible and poor quality, while another person playing that music on a guitar doesn’t get shut down.
Clearly female playing guitar in skimpy outfit gets a pass, while more credible news worthy reporting gets blocked.
Some items feel like historical references that need to be left in place- like old news footage that would be forever lost if someone didn’t save it in a format others can view, share, and do research. This is important. In order to advance society in terms of academic quality, proprietary information sets need to have broader access so that humans can do what they do best- synthesize new information.
You want to save the world, let everyone participate, don’t rely on a few so called experts to advance humanity. Most advances come when others take original ideas and run with it. Most advances are blocked when military grabs Tesla’s journals and makes them top secret, or parcels them out to corporations.
Old, Crazy News:
Exercise Mainbrace is most significant in the sense that it covers UFOs (unidentified flying objects) and USOs (unidentified submerged objects,) witnessed my many military personnel, from multiple nations, in 1952.
In 1952, there were several incidents of UFO flying over the White House. It was bothersome enough that even President Truman demanded to know the truth. The Air Force response, “You can’t handle the truth.” And so, the world was told, “it’s just thermal inversions.”
Maybe if that’s all there was to the story, you’d buy that. Maybe you can dismiss all the eye witnesses that said they saw something metallic solid with their eyes. Air Force Pilots. Journalists. Members of Congress. Maybe you can deny the radar pinging in against solid objects, traveling at greater rates of speeds than anything human made. Maybe you can dismiss pilots were scrambled, gave chase, and these craft circled our aircraft like moon orbiting a planet. They ran circles around us for real.
But, just one story, right. Technically two, because this happened twice, separated by a week. So two inexplicable stories with the same outcome. You can’t handle the truth- it’s just weather.
But, there’s a third a story. Exercise Mainbrace. I would share the FB link that brought me this news item, but it says- you’re temporarily blocked for oversharing data. Seriously? I have forwarded myself two stories in the last month and I am on suspension? I thought sharing Facebook links generates more love for FB?
You will find the original source that resulted in someone else sharing below. Should it get disabled, well… This does feel like a game. Probably not malicious, or evidence of government and corporate control over the dialogue on UFOs. It does feel that way.
There is definitely corporate control over data. If the government deems UFO writers are spreading disinformation, you can bet 90 percent of my Medium essays will be gone. Real science has been blocked, even when documented sources are pharmaceutical studies with references, but UFOs stories are not yet pseudo. Go figure.
Exercise Mainbrace- show the Russians we’re ready for anything… Well, almost anything.
UFO and USO pester NATO fleets. It made the news! So, when skeptics say White House flyover by UFOs was weather, how do they explain this one? Are there USO, underwater thermal inversions that ping in against on sonar? In 1952? It’s certainly not underwater swamp gas. I don’t think we have underwater weather balloons. Probably not a drone in 1952. Could be super fast, intelligent, glow in the dark giant squids. That would make for a good Godzilla movie.
Copy and paste from the article is disabled. Why? People want the story out there, or they don’t? Isn’t this as big a part of the mystery as UFOs themselves?
Who was doing the impressive maneuvers? The photographer trying to get the shot, or the UFO? Would a FOIA request get us those photos Wallace Litwin took while aboard the USS Roosevelt?
Per that article, little information about this has been released to public. There is evidence that quite a bit of exchanged happened between US Navy, US Air Force, the RAF, (UKs Royal Air Force,) and NATO. The incident remains unexplained, and you likely didn’t get much of this from Project Bluebook.
It does stand to reason, UFOs are not just a US secret. NATO is keeping this secret, too. What keeps the alliance members from sharing their own UFO stories? The fact UFOs exist isn’t really a secret. In fact, the US has come out of the UFO closet and says they’re real. So, can NATO now do a data dump of all it’s UFO stories.
Can we have a website dedicated to the entire world’s data set on UFOs, from articles, to pictures, to documentaries, to News reels? I don’t care who runs it or gets credit for it, as long as it is clearly uncensored and raw. And we have the ability to reference and share.
This intermittent release and retraction is just crazy making. It’s a crashed UFO. It’s a weather balloon. It’s UFOs over the White House. It’s thermal inversions. It’s UFOs over a ship. It’s drones.
Seriously, we know it’s UFOs already. Now, show us how you’re making them, or get on to revealing the aliens.
