Well, this is where I guess we just have to disagree. You say there's no proof. I say there is evidence. There is evidence of women saying they were impregnated, they had OBGYNs measure heart beats and had sonograms taken, and suddenly there is no baby, no evidence of miscarriage, and doctors saying 'pseudo-pregnancy' as explanation.
I assume you are right. Gov probably monitored certain 'contactees' very closely. There is clear evidence the US Government has never stopped studying UFOs, even though they denied it for 70 years. Government documents, heavily redacted, is evidence of something. Proof? Not absolute. Just evidence. There is a preponderance of evidence that says there is something to all of this. David Fravor's report of engaging a UFO more than satisfied me. I am satisfied with my conclusions. You are not.
I am satisfied with my conclusions, but am still open to the idea that maybe a certain group of humans has tech way more in advanced than anything known to public, and they are doing things and making it look like aliens. Alternative to aliens, but, the US Government says "it is not our tech." I don't know if they said that with their fingers crossed behind their back. They have been known to lie.
In your unhappiness in this subject, you approached me. This is the challenging part for me. I like our dialogue, and I would like it to be fruitful. Where I struggle is not to elevate your words- which are reasonably skeptical and reasonably requesting greater level of evidence- to what I interpret as anger. There feels like a push back to shut down the discussion. You seem to have a fair knowledge of the subject. I assume you are well read, and you formed your opinion on what you understand and your world paradigm. This normal. All humans do this.
Maybe you come to me because I am easy to access, and I am mostly agreeable to hold conversations. The thing is, there are better writers, more credentialed writers, people of government authority from our nation and other nations, military personnel, people with PhDs in physics, saying it's aliens and that number is growing. That is not proof, but it suggests that the existing evidence and the ongoing accumulation of evidence is shifting this conversation... And so when the US government literally states, in writing, that it has obtained exotic materials, not something terrestrial and clearly manufactured, displaying a technology level greater than anything known to humans... Proof? Well, to the scientist and authorities holding that evidence, proof enough for them. I am sorry they didn't let you hold it. That doesn't mean there isn't evidence. I don't have to do math or know statistics to trust that if a scientist smashes an atom at CERN and reports I saw Muons that he is lying. He could be misinformed and wasn't seeing a muon, but something else.
Sometimes, interjecting faith that people are speaking truth is just as important as proof. There is no benefit to me to persuade you further, other than to find kindly and respectful ways of communicating information, and the allowance for a continuum of potential explanations and counter explanations being exchanged. In that, I can say I am grateful for this conversation. Thank you.
